Althouse |
- "Back in London, enjoying my photos of ethereal icescapes and brilliantly comic penguins, I wonder again whether I should feel guilty for having been in Antarctica?"
- Josh Earnest sent to express the view that the Obama administration "should have sent someone with a higher profile" to the Paris march.
- On finally owning a paper shredder.
- "Buried within the splendid Roger Ebert documentary 'Life Itself' lies a mini-debate over what might be called critical etiquette."
- "Your revolution will not succeed because you have not yet learnt to be frivolous."
- 100 years ago today: The House of Representives voted 174 to 204 against the proposed constitutional amendment guaranteeing women the right to vote.
- Tina Fey's rape joke.
- Leaving The New Yorker to join a lyrics-annotating website?!
- When I'm 64...
- The Anti-Christie.
- "More than three million people have taken part in unity marches across France after 17 people died during three days of deadly attacks in Paris."
- A view of the Wisconsin state capitol building...
- "'Deviance' had long been a preoccupation of sociology and its mother field, anthropology."
- "I’d be happy with a 1/4″ thicker iPhone that lasted for 2 or 3 days."
- R. Crumb gives an interview about the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 12:58 PM PST Asks Juliet Rix at the end of a BBC.com piece titled with another question: "Should tourists be banned from Antarctica?" The article is peppered with similar questions: "Should I be here? Am I, just by setting foot on this extraordinary continent, disturbing a pristine environment and polluting the last great wilderness on earth? She supplies the answer from a "polar expert" named Jane Rumble: "No, just do what you can to preserve it." Well, that's ambiguous! It's apparently the answer to the "should I feel guilty?" question, and the answer to that could be: No, because that's just self-absorbed obsessing within your own mind. It's not doing a damned thing to preserve Antarctica. But should you stay away and guilt-trip others into not going? That would be something you could do to preserve it. I'm just trying to understand the wit and wisdom of polar expert Jane Rumble. |
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 11:18 AM PST "We agree that we should have sent someone with a higher profile in addition to the ambassador to France," the White House press secretary said, obviously impelled by what WaPo calls "intense scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic on Monday, with Republicans sharply criticizing the president at home and both domestic and foreign media raising questions about the dearth of U.S. presence at the event." Eh. It's only the White House press secretary. And he's stepping on John Kerry's message: This is sort of quibbling a little bit in the sense that our assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland was there and marched, our ambassador was there and marched, many people from the embassy were there and marched.But: "The Wall Street Journal reported that Nuland actually marched in Washington, D.C." And: "The Associated Press reports that Kerry said he was going to France on Thursday, to reaffirm U.S. solidarity with its oldest ally." And this garbler of messages is our chief diplomat! And what about Eric Holder, who was in Paris at the time? The Justice Department got out the message that he had "changed his schedule to travel to Paris this weekend to personally express his solidarity with the people of France," but "he had to return to Washington Sunday afternoon." It doesn't say why could could change his schedule but not the part where where "he had to return." Not impressed. |
On finally owning a paper shredder. Posted: 12 Jan 2015 10:57 AM PST For years I kept papers that couldn't be thrown out in the trash in a couple brown paper bags that I seriously believed I was going to burn one day. For a year, I had those bags near the fireplace, but no fire was ever built. Meade talked about burning them outside, in the charcoal grill, but that never happened. I'm trying to relieve the house of clutter, so I didn't like the idea of taking ownership of a new electrical appliance, but last week, I finally did it. I bought a paper shredder. I let it ripen a day before taking it out of the box and a few more days before turning it on and feeding some papers in. This morning, I finally got through the process by opening it up to empty out the shreds. Hey, this stuff is great... There must be something you can do with it. And I mean other than photograph it and blog about it. I google and find this "What to do with shredded paper" Pinterest and am instantly cured of whatever twinges of craftiness I might once have felt. I mean... Gilbert the Shredded-Paper Rabbit says: Noooooo! |
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 10:10 AM PST "Specifically, while Ebert formed close relationships with directors and other talent whose work he critiqued, longtime Time magazine film critic Richard Corliss makes clear he doesn't want to know his subjects at all, joking that he prefers to think of them as fictional characters," writes Brian Lowry at Variety, and I immediately think: That's how I feel about judges and politicians. I do not want to know them. Any personal connection incites empathy. You've got to keep your edge! |
"Your revolution will not succeed because you have not yet learnt to be frivolous." Posted: 12 Jan 2015 10:11 AM PST A line from the 1987 novel "Saints and Scholars" by the communist (his word) academician Terry Eagleton. Asked about that line — why is comedy important? — he says: "It is... because comedy can be a form of friendship, solidarity. I mean, one of the difficulties of being a radical is always being against or outside things. Radicals want to come in from the cold as much as anybody else." For Eagleton, it seems, the cold is part of the radical life – he is now both thinking of Bertolt Brecht and quoting him: "'We who wanted to prepare the ground for friendship could not ourselves be friendly.' "Eagleton says he was "an earnest, high-minded, grim-lipped intellectual" until feminism — of all things! — turned him toward "'low-minded' virtues such as bathos, irony and... comedy." How earnest, high-minded, and grim-lipped a man must be for feminism to lighten him up! |
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 09:29 AM PST "Woman suffrage was discussed from every point of view for more than ten hours in the House today," wrote The New York Times. "At the close of the debate the proposed constitutional amendment giving nation-wide suffrage to women was rejected by the overwhelming vote of 174 to 204." Dr. Anna Howard Shaw, President of the National Suffrage Association, said... "I am not gratified, but the vote was better than I had expected. We now have an alignment from which we can move onward. It is now a political and national question, for Congress would not take up a local or sectional matter in this way. It can never be said again that it is a local or partisan question. The National House of Representatives has discussed suffrage and has voted upon it...."According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Josephine Dodge founded this National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage in 1911 because she "believed that woman suffrage would decrease women's work in communities and their ability to effect societal reforms." The NAOWS had a newsletter called Woman's Protest (retitled Woman Patriot in 1918) that "continued to be published through the 1920s, generally opposing the work of feminists and liberal women's groups." Here's the Wikipedia article "Anti-suffragism," which says: Anti-suffragism was not limited to conservative elements. The anarchist Emma Goldman opposed suffragism on the grounds that women were more inclined toward legal enforcement of morality (as in the Women's Christian Temperance Union), that it was a diversion from more important struggles, and that suffrage would ultimately not make a difference. She also said that activists ought to advocate revolution rather than seek greater privileges within an inherently unjust system. Progressives criticized suffrage in the Utah Territory as a cynical Mormon ploy....Here's a postcard from 1915: |
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 08:01 AM PST She was hosting the Golden Globes (along with Amy Poehler ) last night: "In 'Into the Woods,' " Fey said, "Cinderella runs from her prince, Rapunzel is thrown from a tower for her prince, and Sleeping Beauty just thought she was getting coffee with Bill Cosby." She and Poehler then took turns with their impressions of Cosby saying "I put the pills in the people . . . " (Anyone can do a Cosby impression; anyone who remembers Cosby's Jell-O Pudding Pops ads.) It was not the sharpened moment of post-feminist commentary that, fairly or otherwise, so many of us look for from the duo.I don't know what "sharpened moments of post-feminist commentary" are. That writing is from WaPo TV critic Hank Stuever. I don't know how to sharpen a moment, and I don't know when Tina Fey was supposed to have passed the segment of time that is feminism into the period that lies beyond feminism — post-feminism — but I do know that if you're going to make a rape joke, you'd better figure out why you are doing it and whether you've got a good enough reason and a good enough joke. Rape was the topic chosen by George Carlin for his "I believe you can joke about anything" monologue. (Previously discussed in last summer's post: "There's a gray area of rape, and I call it 'grape.'") Is the fact that you can do a Cosby impression — when, per Stuever, anyone can — a good enough reason? No. But there's more: Fey's female. That might give an extra layer of protection. The ultimate justification is: Comedians should take hard shots at the powerful, and that's what this is. |
Leaving The New Yorker to join a lyrics-annotating website?! Posted: 12 Jan 2015 09:38 AM PST "Sasha Frere-Jones, the longtime pop music critic for The New Yorker, has left the magazine to join Genius, a website mounting an ambitious expansion after starting as a forum for annotated rap lyrics online." Signs of the apocalypse for old media? Or just another data point in the very old process of taking a job that offers much better pay? Mr. Frere-Jones will be an executive editor at Genius, two of its founders, Ilan Zechory and Tom Lehman, said in an interview, with a focus on annotations of music lyrics. He will start this week.The reason Frere-Jones gives is "I don't want to stay up until 4 a.m. any more at shows, and you can annotate lyrics during the day." He's 47. I get it. Sometimes I think, I'd love to live in New York again, because there are all those things you can only do in New York. But then the question becomes: Yes, but would you do them? And the truth is, even when I was in my 20s, when I lived in New York, I found it a struggle to listen to music that went on after midnight. I believe Frere-Jones that the work fits a non-young person's life more comfortably. Good for him for getting the money. And give the New Yorker gig to somebody new, who's up for that sort of thing. We'll all survive. And Genius is a nice format for annotating lyrics, a writing format that's very similar to blogging, and quite delightful, really. A big distinction from blogging, however, is that your writings remain stuck on the lyrics you've attached them to. They don't continually sink down as new stuff is put on top. Not that a blog's archive can't be searched, but in blogging, you do have this sense of layers of time, with the top layer fresh and soon to be pushed down by the next new thing. The tyranny of the timeline is most notable on Twitter and Facebook. If you're a serious writer, it can really get to you. Not that annotating lyrics on Genius seems serious, but the hiring of Sasha Frere-Jones makes it a little more serious than it was before. ADDED: Hey, Genius has a law section. (They should give me a million dollars!) Here's Marbury v. Madison. [AND: The cases are too long to annotate in the spiffy way that works for songs. The Marbury annotations alternate between boring explanations of technical terms and smart-ass observations, for example, pointing out over-broad/unsupported assertions. And most of the lines are just there — in hard-to-read white text on black — without annotation.] |
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 10:13 AM PST is... today. ADDED: Meade IMs links to Grooveshark versions of the old Beatles song, first Judy Collins, then David Grisman. I love the David Grisman (including the location of the cottage — not the Isle of Wight but Tennessee — and the names of the children — not Vera, Chuck, and Dave but Elviry, Charles, and Dave). As for Judy Collins — dear lady, this is not your song. When I get older losing my hair... Judy Collins, bald? As a consequence of mere aging? Judy Collins has managed to get quite old while maintaining a full head of glorious hair. |
Posted: 11 Jan 2015 07:05 PM PST Hugs all around!!! #Packers pic.twitter.com/a85tQKqyOZ |
Posted: 11 Jan 2015 06:41 PM PST "Up to 1.6m are estimated to have taken to the streets of the French capital. More than 40 world leaders joined the start of the Paris march, linking arms in an act of solidarity." World leaders, including British Prime Minister David Cameron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Malian President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, EU President Donald Tusk, and Jordan's King Abdullah II joined the beginning of the Paris march.No leaders from the United States? That's weird. ADDED: Drudge, linking to the Daily News (which points out that Eric Holder was in Paris): AND: I suspect that Holder (and other American politicians) don't want to seem to be supporting what might be perceived as hate speech. |
A view of the Wisconsin state capitol building... Posted: 11 Jan 2015 06:26 PM PST |
"'Deviance' had long been a preoccupation of sociology and its mother field, anthropology." Posted: 11 Jan 2015 06:14 PM PST "Most 'deviance theory' took it for granted that if you did weird things you were a weird person. Normal people made rules—we'll crap over here, worship over here, have sex like so—which a few deviants in every society couldn't keep. They clung together in small bands of misbehavior. Becker's work set out to show that out-groups weren't made up of people who couldn't keep the rules; they were made up of people who kept other kinds of rules. Marijuana smoking, too, was a set of crips, a learned activity and a social game. At a time when the general assumption was that drug use was private and compulsive, Becker argued that you had to learn how to get high." From "The Outside Game/How the sociologist Howard Becker studies the conventions of the unconventional," by Adam Gopnik in The New Yorker. ("Crips" refers to the jazz music Becker had learned — "short phrases that can be combined in a million ways, subjected to all possible variations.") |
"I’d be happy with a 1/4″ thicker iPhone that lasted for 2 or 3 days." Posted: 11 Jan 2015 03:29 PM PST Says Instapundit. I disagree. Thinner is better as long as you can get through the day. A once-a-day routine is easier to follow than an every-other-day or every-third-day routine, so you don't really gain that much from a > 1 day battery life. Not saying a longer battery wouldn't be nice, but the super-thin iPhone is lovely and delightful. 1/4″ thicker would be about twice as thick! |
R. Crumb gives an interview about the Charlie Hebdo massacre. Posted: 11 Jan 2015 03:30 PM PST To Celia Farber at The New York Observer. Crumb has lived in France for quite a while, and Farber is speaking from the U.S.: Farber: We don't have a context for this tradition here, merciless, political satire. One thing I keep noticing is commentators here are pointing out that the cartoons were very offensive and insulting. It's as if we don't understand that was by design. Very intentionally offensive, and very clear about why that couldn't be compromised. That's the part we don't get, as Americans. It's like, "Why did they have to be so mean?"Here's the drawing. It's a drawing labeled "The Hairy Ass of Mohamid!" held up by Crumb himself who is saying "Actually it's the ass of my friend Mohamid Bakhsh, a movie producer who lives in Los Angeles, California," which is apparently a reference to the animator Ralph Bakshi with whom Crumb has a longstanding feud over Fritz the Cat. The whole drawing of Crumb with his drawing of an ass is labeled "A Cowardly Cartoonist." His wife Aline, also a cartoonist, made a drawing of herself looking at this drawing saying "Oh, my God, they're going to come after us! This is terrible…I want to live to see my grandchildren!" and Crumb saying "Well, it's not that bad. And, besides, they've killed enough cartoonists, maybe they've gotten it out of their system." One more bit from the interview: Farber: What was your reaction inside when you first heard about [the Charlie Hebdo massacre]? |
You are subscribed to email updates from Althouse To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
Popular Posts
-
Laughing Squid: Glass Labyrinth, An Interactive Glass-Walled Labyrinth Installation by Artist Robert Morris ...
-
Althouse "Back in London, enjoying my photos of ethereal icescapes and brilliantly comic penguins, I wond...
-
IT Online Jobs SGI Talent Hunt 2013 6th July2013 | Samalkha Group of Institutions Job Fair | www.sgi.ac.in ...
-
Laughing Squid: Po Hseng Hsu, The ‘Bruce Lee’ of Flair Bartending Po Hseng Hsu, The ‘Bruce Lee’ of Fla...
-
Vizag yathapeta projects Highlights: As per VUDA norms Gram Panchayat approved All 30ft &40ft Black metallic Roads Open Drainag...