Althouse

by Unknown on Thursday 15 January 2015

Althouse


"I am glad that the subject of figure training is under consideration, because so much nonsense is talked on the subject of tight-lacing."

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 12:43 PM PST

"The fun of it is, all the condemnation comes from those who don't wear stays, either from men or from women with hobbies and without waists. All who have tried tight-lacing speak approvingly of it. I would not give up my well-made, tight fitting stays for anything. The sensation of being laced in tight is an enjoyable one that only those who have experienced it can understand. I have been in corsets ever since I was eight years of age, and I am now past my teens, and though I am five feet four inches tall and broad in the shoulders, I only measure nineteen inches, and I am in capital health."

That's a letter published by The Toronto Daily Mail on May 5, 1883, quoted in the long Wikipedia article titled "Corset controversy," where I ended up following my idiosyncratic train of thought after reading the Instapundit-linked NYT article "Can Compression Clothing Enhance Your Workout?" ("The clothes also are thought to refine proprioception, which is someone's sense of how the body is positioned in space [and are] also... believed to reduce fatigue and soreness after exercise by literally squeezing the muscles with a kind of no-hands massage and, by increasing blood flow to muscles, help to flush out unwanted exercise-related biochemicals.")

The reason I was moved to blog this — other than my delight at the sheer length of the "Corset controversy" article — was that phrase "women with hobbies and without waists."
Click for more »

50 years ago today: LBJ and MLK talked on the telephone... "I don't want to follow Hitler, but he had a... he had a idea..."

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 08:36 AM PST

Transcript and audio here. Excerpt:
LBJ: We want equality for all, and we can stand on that principle. But I think that you can contribute a great deal by getting your leaders and you yourself, taking very simple examples of discrimination where a man's got to memorize [Henry Wadsworth] Longfellow or whether he's got to quote the first 10 Amendments or he's got to tell you what amendment 15 and 16 and 17 is, and then ask them if they know and show what happens. And some people don't have to do that. But when a Negro comes in, he's got to do it. And we can just repeat and repeat and repeat. I don't want to follow [Adolph] Hitler, but he had a--he had a[n] idea...

MLK: Yeah.

LJB: ...that if you just take a simple thing and repeat it often enough, even if it wasn't true, why, people accept it. Well, now, this is true, and if you can find the worst condition that you run into in Alabama, Mississippi, or Louisiana, or South Carolina, where... well, I think one of the worst I ever heard of is the president of the school at Tuskegee or the head of the government department there or something being denied the right to a cast a vote. And if you just take that one illustration and get it on radio and get it on television and get it in the pulpits, get it in the meetings, get it every place you can, pretty soon the fellow that didn't do anything but follow... drive a tractor, he's say, "Well, that's not right. That's not fair."

MLK: Yes.

LJB:  And then that will help us on what we're going to shove through in the end.

MLK: Yes. You're exactly right about that.

LJB:  And if we do that, we'll break through as--it'll be the greatest breakthrough of anything, not even excepting this [19]64 [Civil Rights] Act. I think the greatest achievement of my administration....

Who said "If my good friend Dr. Gasparri says a curse word against my mother, he can expect a punch"?

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 08:37 AM PST

Pope Francis!

What about turn the other cheek?!

That's from "Pope on Charlie Hebdo: There are limits to free expression."
Francis, who has urged Muslim leaders in particular to speak out against Islamic extremism, went a step further when asked by a French journalist about whether there were limits when freedom of expression meets freedom of religion. Francis insisted that it was an "aberration" to kill in the name of God and said religion can never be used to justify violence.
Unless you insult his mother?
"There are so many people who speak badly about religions or other religions, who make fun of them, who make a game out of the religions of others," he said. "They are provocateurs. And what happens to them is what would happen to Dr. Gasparri if he says a curse word against my mother. There is a limit."
Dr. Gasparri was just the man standing next to him. This isn't specifically about  Gasparri. It's the Pope saying free-speakers, insulting religion, are asking for it.

The Pope came very close to saying that the threat of violence is a good enforcer of the limits that he wants to see enforced.

ADDED: That's Regina Maria Sivori — front and center...



... in case you've got something smart to say and want to make Francis stop this Popemobile and come back there.

"At The Oscar Nominations, It's A Good Year To Be An Idiosyncratic Man."

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 07:17 AM PST

The headline, at NPR, for analysis by Linda Holmes. You have to scroll down to get to the part I was googling to find:
Even for the Oscars — even for the Oscars — this is a really, really lot of white people. Every nominated actor in Lead and Supporting categories — 20 actors in all — is white.
The actor nominees are all white people! You'd think that — at least for show — they'd have felt compelled to nominate the man who went to all that trouble to impersonate Martin Luther King Jr. (in "Selma"). That took effort. You have to really want a whites-only slate to exclude him. (His name, which everyone is now free — at last! — to forget, is David Oyelowo.)

But I'd also noticed how very male-centered the nominated movies are. Holmes says:
• Every nominated director is male. Every nominated screenwriter is male.

• ... Every Best Picture nominee here is predominantly about a man or a couple of men, and seven of the eight are about white men, several of whom have similar sort of "complicated genius" profiles, whether they're real or fictional....
So... "It's A Good Year To Be An Idiosyncratic Man"... but shouldn't it be "It's An Especially Good Year To Be An Idiosyncratic Man"? Movies about an idiosyncratic man are the norm and have been for a long time. Think of all the trailers that begin "In a world where... one man..." Here are "The 10 best 'In a world...' movie trailers."

You'd think Martin Luther King Jr. would fit right in as that one man in a world.

But no. From Oscar's point of view, 2014 was An Especially Good Year To Be An Idiosyncratic White Man.

ADDED: Oscar's answer is: Hey, we did "12 Years a Slave" last year! Wasn't that enough for you?! That is, basically the same argument as: Hey, we elected a black President! Can we stop talking about race now? The answer, even for Hollywood, is: no.

"'Dick Poop' was nominated for an Oscar."

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 06:30 AM PST

The view from Drudge: Chaos!

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 06:27 AM PST



The link goes to an AP story about how it will be hard for the IRS to get to the phone because: "Congress cut the IRS by $346 million for the budget year that ends Sept. 30. [IRS Commissioner John Koskinen] says the agency's $10.9 billion budget is its lowest since 2008. When adjusted for inflation, the budget hasn't been this low since 1998, he said."

So... the usual bellyaching about not getting enough money. The IRS has a lot of nerve to whine about its $10.9 billion while grabbing our last few measly thousands, which we'd like to keep to use to pad our own little budgets.
Koskinen said the IRS has increased efforts to educate tax preparers and the public about the tax implications of the health law, devoting a section of the agency's website to answering questions. Koskinen's advice to taxpayers with questions: Don't call the IRS unless you absolutely have to.
To be fair, the telephone really is an outdated mode of communication. Who, struggling with taxes these days, thinks it will help to call the IRS on the phone? 
Click for more »

"I know such English that I will leave the British behind. You see sir, I can talk English, I can walk English, I can laugh English, I can run English, because English is such a funny language."

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 05:58 AM PST

In 2012, Mitt Romney was nominated on August 27th. In 2016, Mitt Romney is going to be nominated on July 20th.

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 05:29 AM PST

The GOP has decided to do the convention more than a month earlier this time around.
"A convention in July is a historic success for our party and future nominee," RNC chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement. "The convention will be held significantly earlier than previous election cycles, allowing access to crucial general election funds earlier than ever before to give our nominee a strong advantage heading into Election Day."
So, it's all about the money — not about speeding up the selection process? We always know by July who the candidate is. (Finding out who's the VP choice might be in play.) The convention is a theatrical event and it's good to stage it when it will have the best impact, but who watches live TV anymore and are they more amenable to staring at the tube in July than in August? I'll assume it's mostly about money, but perhaps it's a bit about theater.

Did you like my little theater... in the post title?

Oscar nominations about to happen. Watch live here! OSCAR SHOCK: Only white actors nominated!

Posted: 15 Jan 2015 06:54 AM PST

I would not have noticed, but my younger son IM'd me — at 7:20 a.m., which seemed odd.

ADDED: I took out the live-stream embed, because it's over. You can read the lists of nominees here.

My off-hand observations: Sniper killed. Selma snubbed. Everything looks super male-character-centered. And: Laura Dern!!!

ALSO: The acting nominees are all white people. This, in a year with "Selma."

AND: I have more to say about the race and gender politics here.

"El Capitan’s Dawn Wall Climbers Reach Top at Yosemite."

Posted: 14 Jan 2015 04:08 PM PST

Yay!!
When the men reached the top, they were greeted by a crowd of 70 and enjoyed Champagne and fried chicken.

Should we — can we — ban selective abortion?

Posted: 14 Jan 2015 04:02 PM PST

Over at Slate, Amanda Marcotte is writing about a bill in the Indiana legislature that would ban abortion motivated by the disability including "a mental disability or retardation; a physical disfigurement; Scoliosis; Dwarfism; Down syndrome; Albinism; Amelia; and physical or mental disease."
Bills banning sex-selective abortions are trendy among the anti-choice set because, while those abortions aren't actually common in real life, it's politically expedient to traffic in ugly stereotypes of daughter-hating Asian immigrants.... Banning the non-existent problem of sex-selective abortion is an easy way to grandstand and score "pro-life" points while preening about how pro-woman you are. But banning abortions for fetal abnormalities could negatively affect all sorts of women—and their husbands—including those that tend to vote Republican.
Such ugliness to that rhetoric! This is such a sad subject, from either side. Show some empathy! Show some soul! 

"People have to realize, we try cases in the real world. We take our witnesses as we find them."

Posted: 14 Jan 2015 03:35 PM PST

"We did not pick Jay to be Adnan's accomplice. Adnan picked Jay. Remember, Jay committed a crime here. He was an accomplice after the fact in a murder. A very serious crime. And there is almost always during a trial when you're dealing with people out of a criminal milieu, that they have a lot of things they don't want to talk about.... Like I said, people who are engaged in criminal activity, it's like peeling an onion. The initial thing they say is, 'I don't know a thing about this.' And then 'Well, I sort of saw this.' You get different stories as you go along. This is the real world. We don't pick our witnesses, we have to put them on as they are. There were a lot of inconsistencies throughout Jay's prior statements. Almost all of them involve what we would call collateral facts. A material fact is something directly related to the question of guilt or innocence. A material fact would have been, 'I was with Adnan,' and then you've got the cellphone corroborating that material fact. A collateral fact would be, We were at Joe's Sub Shop,' but then you find out actually they were at the auto repair store. That's a collateral fact. It's not necessarily material to the question of guilt or innocence. So, many of the material facts were corroborated through the cellphone records including being in Leakin Park...."

From the excellent Intercept interview with the prosecutor in the case that was the subject of the popular podcast "Serial."

"2 UVA Frats Refuse to Sign Agreement Forged After Rape Story."

Posted: 14 Jan 2015 02:57 PM PST

"Alpha Tau Omega and Kappa Alpha Order said the university was wrong to suspend all Greek life in the wake of a Nov. 19 article that purported to detail the gang rape of a woman named 'Jackie'..."
"The fact is the university has never acknowledged that they made a mistake in suspending 25 percent of the student body that had nothing to do with an article that proved to be erroneous," said [Kevin O'Neill, a lawyer for the two frats]. "The university has not apologized and has not explained why they took this action.... Some of the things they are asking students to do, like stand at top of the stairs and monitor rooms, creates a duty the school should be bearing themselves if that's their concern."

Leave a Reply

Popular Posts